Phone a Friend (Peer Review)
Get a second AI to review the first AI’s work. Because even AIs need fact-checkers.
⚠️ Note: This feature is currently under active development. The UI is in place but the API route is being refined. Check back soon!
What Is It?
When Claude gives you an answer, you can ask GPT to review it. Or vice versa. A different AI model looks at the first one’s work and calls out:
- Issues — Things that are wrong
- Suggestions — Things that could be better
- Confirmations — Things that are correct
It’s like having two experts on call instead of one.
How to Trigger It
Manual Trigger
Hover over any AI response and click ”🤝 Get Second Opinion”.
Auto-Review (Coming Soon)
Enable in Settings to automatically review important responses.
Review Focus Areas
When triggering, you can pick a focus:
| Focus | Good For |
|---|---|
| Code | Syntax, bugs, best practices |
| Security | Vulnerabilities, auth issues |
| Architecture | Design patterns, scalability |
| Accuracy | Factual correctness |
| General | Broad review, all areas |
Reading the Review
Reviews appear below the original response:
┌────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 🤖 Claude's Response │
│ [Original answer here] │
├────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 🔍 Review by GPT-4 │
│ │
│ ⚠️ CRITICAL: SQL injection risk in │
│ the query builder │
│ │
│ 💡 SUGGESTION: Consider using │
│ parameterized queries │
│ │
│ ✅ CONFIRMED: Auth flow is correct │
└────────────────────────────────────────┘Severity Levels
| Icon | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 🔴 Critical | Serious problem, fix immediately |
| 🟡 Warning | Potential issue, worth addressing |
| 🔵 Suggestion | Improvement idea, not urgent |
| ✅ Confirmed | Reviewer agrees with this point |
Cross-Provider Review
The magic: the reviewer is always a different provider.
| If Original Is… | Reviewer Is… |
|---|---|
| Claude | GPT or Gemini |
| GPT | Claude or Gemini |
| Gemini | Claude or GPT |
This reduces blind spots. Different models have different training data and biases.
Memory Writeback
When a review catches something useful, Chorum can save it to project memory:
- Click “Save Pattern” on a review item
- It becomes a learned pattern
- Future responses will consider it
Example: If GPT catches that Claude forgot input validation, that pattern gets saved. Next time you ask about forms, the AI remembers.
Cost
Reviews cost money — you’re making an additional API call. The cost appears next to the review:
Review: $0.004For code review and security checks, it’s usually worth it.
When to Use It
Yes, use it for:
- Production code
- Security-sensitive stuff
- Important decisions
- Anything you’ll ship
Maybe skip it for:
- Quick questions
- Learning/exploration
- Fun conversations
- Local models (slower)
Force a Reviewer
By default, Chorum picks the reviewer. But you can force one:
- Click “Get Second Opinion”
- Hold Shift while clicking
- Pick your preferred reviewer
Useful if you specifically want Claude’s take on GPT’s code, or vice versa.
→ Back to: Chat Overview